Skip to main content

Could direct air capture prevent climate change?

Could direct air capture prevent climate change?


direct air capture (dAC) is an appealing way to tackle climate change: just pass ambient air over chemicals that absorb the Co2 driving global warming, and then use or store the Co2. dAC differs from the better-known carbon capture and storage (CCs) in that it can be done anywhere, not just at big sources of Co2 such as power stations. it’s more effective than natural Co2 ‘scrubbing’ using trees and plants, and can be performed where the Co2 is most easily stored or re-used. unlike CCs at power stations, dAC must be effective at removing the far more dilute Co2 in ambient air. this demands special equipment and chemicals, plus renewable energy sources producing zero Co2. that has led to grave doubts about the economic viability of dAC. For now, it remains an intriguing but impractical remedy for global warming. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DOES HOLDING YOUR BREATH MAKE YOU STRONGER?

It won’t make you stronger in the sense of building muscle in your heart or diaphragm, but holding your breath while training for certain sports has been shown to improve the ability of your muscles to cope with short, intense exertions. This works by increasing the concentration of bicarbonate in the blood, which helps to neutralise the lactic acid produced during anaerobic exercise. For this technique to work, you need to exhale normally and hold your breath when your lungs are empty, rather than taking a big breath in and holding that. There are significant risks, though. A 2009 study found that free divers who regularly held their breath for several minutes had elevated levels of a protein called S100B in their blood, which is an indication of long-term brain damage.
Post a Comment
Read more

HOW DO STARS DIE?

Stars die because they exhaust their nuclear fuel. The events at the end of a star’s life depend on its mass. Really massive stars use up their hydrogen fuel quickly, but are hot enough to fuse heavier elements such as helium and carbon. Once there is no fuel left, the star collapses and the outer layers explode as a ‘supernova’. What’s left over after a supernova explosion is a ‘neutron star’ – the collapsed core of the star – or, if there’s sufficient mass, a black hole. Average-sized stars (up to about 1.4 times the mass of the Sun) will die less dramatically. As their hydrogen is used up, they swell to become red giants, fusing helium in their cores, before shedding their outer layers, often forming a ‘planetary nebula’. The star’s core remains as a ‘white dwarf’, which cools off over billions of years. The tiniest stars, known as ‘red dwarfs’, burn their nuclear fuel so slowly that they might live to be 100 billion years old – much older than the current age of the Universe....
Post a Comment
Read more

Why do different countries use different mains voltages?

Why do different countries use different mains voltages? the biggest disparity is between the usA on 110V and most of the rest of the world on 230V. America’s lower voltage goes all the way back to thomas edison, who introduced direct current (dC) mains electricity at 110V. edison’s rival nikola tesla showed that long power lines transmitted alternating current (AC) more efficiently than dC. His AC approach won out, but he stuck with edison’s 110V. But by the time electrification spread to europe early in the 20th Century, lamps had filaments that could give out more light and handle greater power loads. so the Berliner elektrizitätswerke company in Germany established 230V as the standard. 
Post a Comment
Read more